# Premium Review Preview — P-017 Workflow

**Demonstration only · Fictional data · Version 1.0 · Review status: annotated example**

## Deterministic readiness output

| Dimension | Score | Interpretation |
|---|---:|---|
| Data Preparation | 75% | Current strength |
| Attendance | 63% | Needs consistent ownership |
| OT | 38% | Priority gap |
| Leave | 75% | Current strength |
| Payroll Input | 63% | Add second-person review |
| Checking | 50% | Priority gap |
| Documentation | 63% | Improve evidence references |
| Closing | 50% | Priority gap |

Each dimension uses two 0–4 answers: `(answer 1 + answer 2) ÷ 8 × 100`, rounded to a whole percentage. No LLM determines the score.

## Submitted workflow

“OT files are collected by chat until cut-off. Late entries are discussed case by case. The team wants one repeatable record of what arrived, which rule applies and who decides.”

## Annotated feedback and action

1. **Fact gap:** Chat does not create a controlled received-at record. Add one timestamped OT register.
2. **Rule gap:** Document the approved cut-off and escalation path. Never infer a penalty or automatic withholding.
3. **Review gap:** Require reviewer, date, status and evidence reference before closure.
4. **Privacy:** Use participant IDs in learning review; keep real data in the employer’s approved system.

| Gap | Action | Owner | Completion evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| No late-OT trace | Start controlled register | Payroll preparer | Timestamped register |
| Decision unclear | Approve escalation rule | Payroll owner | Versioned rule |
| Review invisible | Add reviewer/date/status | Reviewer | Closed exception |

**Scope:** One de-identified administration case. Excludes legal opinion, complex calculation, unlimited checking, custom setup and implementation consulting.