VECTOR.

INSPECTABLE LEARNING SAMPLES

See the work before you choose the course

Five connected, fictional assets show the calculation trace, monthly workflow, Premium review, handbook review and management-value method. Open the source; check the assumptions and limits.

DEMO COMPANY A · FICTIONAL · VERSION 1.0Training example — not client work
Back to programme →

01 / 05

1 · Worked payroll review

P-017 has one approved unpaid-leave day and two OT entries received after the internal cut-off.

InputDemo valueRequired evidenceReview state
Monthly basic payRM3,000.00Approved employee masterAssumed
Unpaid-leave days1Approved leave recordPresent
Payroll divisor26Current approved ruleRule review needed
OT entries2Approved OT recordAfter cut-off
Deterministic illustration

RM3,000.00 ÷ 26 × 1 = RM115.38, rounded to two decimals. The arithmetic is traceable; the divisor and real treatment still require current approved evidence.

Reviewer decision

Late OT is logged for fact/rule review. It is never silently rejected or automatically withheld.

Open usable Markdown source ↗

02 / 05

2 · RM300 preparation worksheet

A blank template and a filled row show the monthly work, owner, deadline, input, check and improvement question.

StepResponsible roleDeadlineInputBasic checkImprovement question
OTLine manager22nd · 3pmApproved OT listCount + approver presentHow are late entries routed without silent rejection?
ClosingPayroll reviewer27thException logEvery exception has owner/dateWhat enters next month’s control plan?

+ ____ / ____ / ____ / ____ / ____ / ____

Open usable Markdown source ↗

03 / 05

3 · Premium review preview

The score is deterministic: two 0–4 answers per dimension, divided by 8 and shown as a percentage. No LLM decides the score.

Data Preparation75%
Attendance63%
OT38%
Leave75%
Payroll Input63%
Checking50%
Documentation63%
Closing50%
Annotated feedback

OT is the priority gap at 38%. Add one timestamped register, document the approved escalation rule, then require reviewer, date, status and evidence before closure.

Open usable Markdown source ↗

04 / 05

4 · Handbook operational review

Fictional clause

“Overtime submitted after the monthly deadline may be processed in a later payroll cycle.”

Review rubric

Can staff identify the cut-off? Is submission time retained? Who decides exceptions? Can the status flow to payroll? Has current official or qualified review been obtained?

Open usable Markdown source ↗

05 / 05

5 · Management value worksheet

Time capacity and direct cash expense stay separate.

2 issues × 3 people × 1.5 hours × 12 months = 108 hours. 108 × an approved RM50/hour planning assumption = RM5,400 indicative internal time cost. Direct cash expense in this demo = RM0.
Open usable Markdown source ↗